Neuro Linguistic Programming has an early model called 'Classic Code' and the 'New Code' is the new model contrast please <>
Thus I asked the new platform https://storm.genie.stanford.edu/
Storms Summary:
Neuro-Linguistic Programming (NLP) is a psychological approach that encompasses a variety of models and techniques aimed at facilitating personal development and behavioral change.
Two primary frameworks within NLP are the Classic Code and the New Code, which represent different philosophies and methodologies for achieving similar goals.
The Classic Code, developed by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the early 1970s, emphasizes structured techniques for modifying behavior by focusing on conscious thought patterns and predetermined strategies. This approach has garnered attention for its effectiveness in behavioral change but has faced criticism for its mechanistic nature, which may overlook the complexities of individual experiences and relational dynamics.[1] [2] [3]
In contrast, the New Code, co-created by John Grinder and Carmen Bostic St Clair in the late 1980s, evolved as a response to the perceived limitations of the Classic Code. The New Code prioritizes accessing deeper cognitive and emotional states, promoting personal evolution through experiential learning and high-performance games. This model seeks to harness the interplay between the conscious and unconscious minds, allowing for more flexible and organic methods of change. The New Code has gained recognition for its adaptability and holistic approach, addressing the nuances of personal transformation that Classic Code methodologies may miss.[2] [4] [5]
The distinctions between these two approaches highlight significant shifts in the field of NLP. While the Classic Code is characterized by its rigid techniques and explicit frameworks, the New Code encourages a more dynamic engagement, focusing on the relational aspects of change and the ecological context of individual experiences. This divergence has led to ongoing debates about the effectiveness and applicability of each model in various settings, including therapy, coaching, education, and corporate environments.[6] [3] [5]
Both Classic Code and New Code NLP offer valuable insights into the nature of human behavior and change, and practitioners often draw on elements from both to tailor their approaches to individual needs. The evolution of these frameworks underscores the ongoing development of NLP as a discipline and its relevance in contemporary personal development practices.[4] [7] [5]
Classic Code
Classic Code, the original model of Neuro Linguistic Programming (NLP), was developed by Richard Bandler and John Grinder in the early 1970s. This approach primarily focuses on behavioral change, utilizing specific techniques designed to alter undesirable behaviors by identifying and modifying the underlying thought patterns and strategies that lead to these behaviors[1].
Key Features of Classic Code
One of the defining characteristics of Classic Code NLP is its emphasis on techniques and structured procedures. Practitioners often work with submodalities, which are the fundamental elements that shape how individuals process and represent information in their minds[6] .
The Classic Code approach tends to operate at a conscious level, emphasizing explicit models that practitioners can follow. Questions such as "What behavior do you want to change?" and "What technique should be applied?" are commonplace among Classic Code practitioners, who often aim to fit clients to these predetermined procedures rather than adapting interventions to the specific needs of each individual[2] [6] .
Techniques and Applications
Classic Code practitioners employ a variety of interventions, focusing primarily on behavioral change through techniques that have been thoroughly modeled and documented. This often results in a mechanistic approach where the subtleties of personal experiences may be overlooked[3]
. The reliance on specific techniques and procedures can be beneficial for those who prefer a more cerebral and systematic method of personal development. While Classic Code has proven effective in many contexts, its structured nature can limit flexibility in adapting to the unique dynamics of individual clients. Therefore, while it offers robust frameworks for behavioral change, it may not always account for the complexities of human experience and relationships that are essential for personal evolution[2] [6] .
Legacy and Evolution
Despite its limitations, Classic Code has laid the groundwork for the development of NLP as a whole and continues to be taught and practiced extensively. Richard Bandler's ongoing work with Classic Code reinforces its foundational concepts, even as new models, such as the New Code, emerge to address some of its perceived shortcomings. This interplay between the Classic Code and newer methodologies highlights the ongoing evolution of NLP and the diverse approaches practitioners can adopt[2] [3] .
New Code
New Code Neuro Linguistic Programming (New Code NLP) is a modern evolution of Neuro Linguistic Programming co-created by John Grinder and Carmen Bostic St Clair, beginning in the late 1980s. This approach was developed as a response to perceived flaws in the Classic Code NLP, with the goal of enhancing the effectiveness of change processes by shifting focus from mere behavioral changes to deeper cognitive and emotional states[2] [4].
Key Concepts
State vs. Behavior
A fundamental distinction between Classic Code NLP and New Code NLP lies in the emphasis on working at the level of state rather than solely at the level of behavior. New Code NLP posits that accessing high-performance states can lead to more profound and sustainable changes in behavior. This approach encourages individuals to utilize "games" or experiential learning activities that facilitate the induction of these high-performance states, which can then be transferred to contexts where change is desired[2] [7].
High Performance Games
Central to New Code NLP are High Performance Games, which serve as a coaching tool designed to promote effective change. These games require participants to engage in a structured process that includes observing a specific context in their life, stepping into that context to experience it, and then utilizing the game to induce a high-performance state. Afterward, individuals revisit the original context to observe changes in their reactions and behaviors[8].
Notable examples of these games include 'The Alphabet Game' and 'The NASA Game,' each designed to activate both hemispheres of the brain and engage multiple sensory modalities[8] [1].
Evolution and Applications
New Code NLP is characterized by its continual evolution, as John Grinder and his team regularly update and refine its methodologies to incorporate new insights and practices. This adaptability has enabled New Code NLP to find applications across various domains, including business, education, health, coaching, and trauma recovery. The intent is to create effective interventions that lead to enhanced choices, performance, and congruency in various aspects of life[5] [4].
Distinctions from Classic Code NLP
While New Code NLP shares some foundational principles with Classic Code NLP, it introduces several innovative techniques aimed at simplifying processes and enhancing efficacy. New Code practitioners are encouraged to "talk less" and "do more," minimizing over-analysis and allowing the subconscious mind to facilitate change more efficiently. This marks a significant departure from the Classic Code's focus on detailed verbal processing and historical context[5] [4] [1].
Comparison Between Classic Code and New Code
Overview of Classic Code NLP
Classic Code NLP, developed by Richard Bandler and John Grinder, primarily focuses on behavioral interventions through structured techniques. Practitioners typically aim to identify specific behaviors a client wishes to change, isolating these behaviors to a particular context and proposing alternative behaviors as substitutes[1].
This model emphasizes the conscious mind, relying on explicit techniques and often divorcing them from their original contexts. Common inquiries among Classic Code NLP practitioners include how to apply these techniques and the appropriate contexts for their use, which can lead to a tendency to fit clients into predefined procedures rather than tailoring interventions to individual needs[5].
Emergence of New Code NLP
In contrast, New Code NLP, co-created by John Grinder and Carmen Bostic St Clair in the late 1980s, shifts the focus from techniques to the relationship between the conscious and unconscious minds. This model seeks to foster personal evolution and emphasizes a more organic approach to change. New Code practitioners engage with clients by using framing extensively before teaching patterns or implementing interventions, presupposing that the unconscious mind has access to a vast array of resources[5].
By consulting the unconscious, clients can better navigate the complexities of decision-making, as the unconscious can deliver insights and solutions that may not be immediately apparent to the conscious mind [6].
Key Differences
The fundamental difference between the two models lies in their emphasis and methodology. Classic Code NLP is characterized by its mechanistic approach and reliance on structured techniques, which can sometimes neglect the relational dynamics of the client’s experience. Practitioners are often focused on explicit models, resulting in a more rigid application of NLP strategies[1] [3].
In contrast, New Code NLP embraces movement and the interplay between consciousness and unconsciousness, allowing for a more flexible and dynamic engagement with clients[5] [3].
Additionally, New Code NLP recognizes the importance of context in shaping behavior, asserting that all actions occur within specific frameworks that can influence outcomes. This understanding leads to a more holistic approach to facilitating change, respecting the ecological balance of the individual's life and experiences[6] [5].
Practical Implications
For individuals choosing between these two approaches, the decision may depend on personal preference. Those who favor a cerebral, analytical style may gravitate towards Classic Code NLP, while those drawn to a more experiential and movement-oriented methodology may find New Code NLP more appealing [3].
Ultimately, both styles are effective and can complement each other, providing practitioners with a broader toolkit for facilitating personal transformation and excellence [5].
=================================================================